It was just after 3 p.m. on this Good Friday, a time when the Christian World acknowledges the death of Christ and his dead body's removal from the Cross. This moment of annual Historical remembrance was barely noticed by a soft-spoken and broken couple as he dipped and she napped while leaning against a wall at their typical location, the intersection of This and That.
He had just injected his latest dose of medicine which his body demands. He was dipping out from its effect. She lay next to him exhausted from the never-ending requirement of doing ‘dates’ to fund their combined drug use.[1]
As the dip and the nap came to a natural conclusion for each, she stood up next to him and rubbed his neck and they loved on each other the way a devoted couple does. She then put on some makeup in preparation for the man who would be picking her up for a weekend-long date for his own pleasures.
As the car pulled away, I could not help but realize the power play that had just transpired in front of me. It’s an unspoken monologue of the 'date' to the long-time lover of the lady who is trapped in the middle of this drama.
"I'm going to have sex with your lady because I have the money and you have the addiction."
The actual lover of the lady has no rebuttal available. He's trapped. As the woman of this[2] heterosexual couple, she's the breadwinner. She raises the money by making herself available to any guy who will pay her for 'services.'
Is "trapped" the right word for this situation?
In their medically weakened and spiritually broken condition, can they endure the climb up "Medicaid Mountain" with its narrow cliff trails and absence of guard rails that would keep them from falling?
Most people in such a condition can't make the climb up the mountain. It's easier to stay on the known side of the mountain than it is to climb it in hopes of getting to the land of healing and renewed health.
So, in that sense "trapped" is the right word.
The medical and legislative powers that be must plow down Medicaid Mountain!
To do so, every real and perceived obstacle that the patient claims is holding them back from starting the journey to healing must be identified and removed from the path. While it's very true that the patient must do the work of their own healing, the medical community must make it possible for the patient to do so.
All patients of any
medical diagnosis have the right to decide when they will seek professional help
toward healing. When any Medicaid-reliant Substance
Use Disorder patient finds that ready moment, they must not be required to
climb a mountain before getting to the care they now want.
Plow down Medicaid Mountain and you will untrap this soft-spoken and currently broken couple.
[1] The total cost is 4 to $500 per 24-hour cycle
[2] Or any
**********
Legislative Briefing Addendum: "Plowing Down Medicaid Mountain"
Case Study: The $500-a-Day Power Play Strategic Objective: To transition Medicaid from a "Gatekeeper" model to a "Service" model by removing every administrative barrier that functions as a "cliff trail" for the unstable patient.
I. The Human Narrative: The Unspoken Monologue
You observed a heartbreaking "Good Friday" reality: a devoted couple forced apart by the financial requirements of their shared illness. As the woman leaves for a "weekend-long date," her partner turns his back, unable to witness the humiliation required to fund their survival. The "Power Play" is clear: the predator has the money, and the couple has the addiction. They are not choosing this life; they are trapped by a $500-a-day debt to their own biology.
To the couple standing at the base of the mountain: We recognize that you cannot "climb" in your current state. The heavy lifting should not be on the broken patient; it should be on the system designed to heal them.
II. The "Lynne’s Laws" Priority Framework
This narrative identifies the "Narrow Cliff Trails" of the current system and proposes the following:
Priority Pillar: The "Zero-Barrier" Entry Act.
The Law: Mandates that a request for treatment by a Medicaid-eligible SUD patient must be met with an immediate placement within four hours, regardless of paperwork, prior identification, or "sobriety" at the time of intake.
The Application: This law "plows the mountain." It removes the requirement for the patient to navigate complex phone trees, find lost documents, or travel to multiple offices while in withdrawal.
Priority Pillar: The "Breadwinner" Protection Clause.
The Law: Recognizes the unique exploitation of women in the street economy. It provides immediate emergency housing and stabilization to "un-trap" the female breadwinner from the cycle of "dates" the moment she identifies as being in a high-risk exploitation environment.
III. The Professional Tension and Consensus
The Supportive View: Social workers and street medicine teams argue that the "Mountain" is built of red tape. They support the Zero-Barrier Entry Act because they know that the window of "readiness" for a patient is often short and easily closed by a single "no" or "call back tomorrow" from an insurance rep.
The Skeptical View (Addressing the Legislator): Skeptics argue that "Zero-Barrier" entry is a logistical nightmare. They ask, "Where do the beds come from?" and "Who pays for the intake if the paperwork isn't finished?"
The Lynne’s Law Resolution: This is a Market Stabilization law. It is cheaper to pay for an immediate intake than to pay for the $500-a-day "street tax" which manifests as theft, emergency room visits for assaults, and the public health crisis of the sex trade. We don't build more mountains; we build more Bridges.
IV. Legislative "Teeth": The "No-Refusal" Standard
The Objective Standard: Any facility receiving Medicaid funds is legally prohibited from turning away a patient based on "administrative incompleteness." If a bed is available, the patient is admitted first; the paperwork is finished second.
Strict Liability: If a patient is told to "come back tomorrow" and is harmed or killed in the intervening hours, the facility is held liable for Failure to Intervene.
V. The Prevention Savings
By plowing down the mountain, Pennsylvania saves on:
The Costs of Exploitation: Each "date" prevented is a reduction in the potential for violent crime and human trafficking cases.
The "Lost Opportunity" Cost: Every day a person spends "climbing the mountain" is a day they aren't in the workforce or with their families.
VI. The Corrected Path
Under Lynne’s Laws, when that couple reached their "ready moment," there would be no mountain to climb. The woman would not have to prepare makeup for a stranger; she would be preparing for an intake. The partner would not have to turn his back in shame; he would be walking through the front door of a stabilization center alongside her. The "Power Play" of the predator would be neutralized by the Power of the Law.
#LynnesLaws
The Lynne’s Laws: Master Priority List (Ranked by Leverage)
Priority One: The Medical Necessity and Parity Act. (The Foundation). Defines the "Trap" as a medical emergency.
Priority Two: The "Zero-Barrier" Entry Act (New). (The Plow). Removes the administrative "climb" and mandates 4-hour placement.
Priority Three: The Clinical Stabilization Act (The Beba Clause). Prevents the "Hostile Discharge" once they finally get off the street.
Priority Four: The Immediate Diagnostic Access Act. Replaces the "Prior Authorization" waiting game with immediate care.
Priority Five: The Biological Necessity Defense Act. Protects the "broken couple" from being criminalized for their cellular protest.
Priority Six: The Right to Patient Identity Act. Forces the system to see the "Devoted Couple," not the "Addicts."
Priority Seven: The Mandatory Continuity of Care Statute. Ensures the "Warm Handoff" so they don't fall back down the mountain.
I have updated the list to include "The Zero-Barrier Entry Act" as a top-three priority. This is the "Plow" that clears the path for everything else.
No comments:
Post a Comment